Common sense isn't.
Purpose of this site:
- To challenge the claims by TVA and others that customers should volunteer to pay extra to buy "Green Choice" power on the basis that it is good for the environment.
- To challenge the assertion that wind power, as being implemented by TVA, is better for the environment than coal, nuclear or hydro power.
- To challenge the proposition that energy options justify a cost premium solely on the basis that they consume no fuel, which is the essential position of wind power proponents.
- To assert that Green Choice power sources, particularly wind, have not been demonstrated to be a good investment, when balancing cost of energy and effects on the environment.
Even non-fueled power plants like wind power plants have disadvantages. Among them is, as implemented by TVA, the sacrifice of a remote mountain top recreational area for installation of a power plant. While the Green Choice proponents like to say they are "reclaiming" an old strip mine, the fact is they are simply using the land again in much the same way. Some would say the wind power plant is as unsightly as strip mining, possibly more long lasting, and more visible from longer distances.
All energy sources involve risks and disadvantages that we accept. Even the wind power proponents sometimes agree that "The same standards should be applied to wind energy: nothing more, nothing less." ( Paul Gipe (archive 2003), Wind Energy Comes of Age, p. 363, Amazon)
In this region, a basic question is: Which is a better investment of our money? Spending $4 extra per 150 kwh to support "Green Choice" power, or spending the extra money to reduce coal plant emissions? Along this line, another question is how competitive is the rate we are offered? Here was a site that offered wind power for less than $3 per 150 kwh block (archive 1999) (2/100 = 3/150). Are we being asked to volunteer to be gouged?
| Quote of the moment |
| Of course we will continue to work for cheaper electricity in the homes and on the farms of America; for better and cheaper transportation; for low interest rates; for sounder home financing; for better banking; for the regulation of security issues; for reciprocal trade among nations and for the wiping out of slums. And my friends, for all of these we have only begun to fight. |
| ~ Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882–1945), U.S. president. FDR Speaks authorized edition of speeches, 1933-1945 (recordings of Franklin Roosevelt’s public addresses), side 3, address at Madison Square Garden, New York (Oct. 31, 1936), ed. Henry Steele Commager, Introduction by Eleanor Roosevelt, Washington Records, Inc. (1960). In this campaign speech the President laid out the major programs which the New Deal had introduced or was about to pursue, including TVA, banking legislation, the SEC, railroad regulation, farm and home owners loans, AAA and conservation, Social Security, and the CCC. ~ |
Common sense isn't.
Images stored locally for protection of your privacy (unless/until you search with Google).
Disclaimer Fine Print: This site is personal, and is independent of TVA or any other organization. Use of the abbreviation "TVA" is purely for descriptive purposes (for example, to distinguish from wind power plants on Buffalo Ridge in Minnesota). No endorsement, no approval, and no involvement by TVA is implied.
Copyright © 2000- hal9000[zat]mensetmanus.net
I last touched this page on
Tuesday, 2022-11-15 at 11:17:12 UTC.